
I was reading in the Ecologist today and came across an article about religion and how it can get us back to a good understanding of nature and how to preserve it.
“The natural world is our Bible. We don’t have chapters and verses; we have trees and fish and animals…The Indian sense of natural law is that nature informs us and it is our obligation to read nature as you would a book, to feel nature as you would a poem, to touch nature as you would yourself, to be part of that and step into its cycles as much as you can.”–John Mohawk
Obviously–as the stereotype has often pointed to (somewhat correctly), the native americans belief system/religion has revolved around the earth and its cycles. They learned to respect and revere it because they were closely involved with its cycles, they drank from water easily fouled by neighboring tribes, they understood in the interconnectivity with the plants and animals around them.
Today we have lost the sacred connection through the reformation and mechanization of our cultures. Puritans banned solstice and may day celebrations on the grounds that it (may day) celebrated male fertility. But why should we not thank God for fertility? Why should we not thank God for the wonderous creation that he has laid down? There are bounds, the bible expresses some concerns that we not worship the creation more than the creator, and to live out our potential, that we follow certain principles in our lives…but how did we fall into legalism and loose the connection with our sacred earth? Then with the mechanistic view of Rene Descartes, nature became no more than dead matter and everything became matter, governed by mathmatics and chemical interactions. This, the article points out, is a very humanistic mindset–only humans make machines. In this mindset nature has no soul, nature is a resource to be developed and exploited.
“If you assume that nature is inanimate then nothing natural has a life, purpose, or value. Natural resources are there fto be developed, and the only value placed on them is by market forces and official planners. And if you assume that only humans are conscious, only humans have reason, and therefore only humans have true value, then it’s fine to have animals in factory farms and to exploit the world in whatever way you like, and if you do conserve any bit of the earth then you have to conserve it with human ends in mind. Everything is justified in human terms.” (qtd. Ecologist Sept. 07, pg. 41)
This mechanistic view has become a religion of its own, the author suggests…built on the “orthodoxy of economic progress.” A perspective that is now the global disease of modern cultures.
It seems that since the industrial revolution this viewpoint exploded into reality…Past the 1900s air pollution spiked, population spiked, water quality issues exploded into reality.
It is interesting the cycles of life that the world goes through…religion once brought man close to Nature as it drew him close to God. Then it walled him off from it through the stoic practices and philosophies from the puritans through fundamental christianity and neglect of other established religions.
Science seemed to do the same, by focusing on rationalism, matter, mathmatics, etc. it moved us into the industrial age of exploiting the earth and forces around us, but now it has driven us closer to understanding the earth. But it seems that science has branched off into industrial sciences and engeneering, and environmental and natural sciences.
Like this article suggests, I do believe the answer is to blend all these concerns and views to draw us back to the earth. Perhaps religion will be the driving force of this cooperation. Perhaps just allowing all the shackles of sciences, religions, etc. to fall away we will once again feel nature and instinctively draw our understanding back to it as a living creation that we are deeply connected to.
“In others words, we don’t need to be told by science, religion, or anyone that it is alive, valuable and worthy of respect and reverence. Deep down, we can feel it for ourselves. Many people have urges to get back to nature in some way, to escape to the hills…these imuplses are moving us in the right direction.”
“If people feel more conncected to the world around them, they might be less likely to accept its destruction” (42)
Different faiths outlooks on nature:
Bahha’ism: Nature is God’s Will and it its expression in and through the contingent world.
Buddhism: Nature is a teacher, a spiritual force, and a way of life.
Judaism: Torah prohibits harming God’s earth, humility in the face of nature “Ask the beasts, and they will teach you; the birds of the sky, and they will tell you; or seak to the earth and it will teach you;…”Job 12:7-9
Christianity: Genesis tells us that man was put on earth to care for it. Romans 8:19 has been interpreted to be an urge for christians to work towards a time when the earth will be liberated from its bondage to decay.
Hinduism: Vishnu made the universe to that every element is interlinked–disturbance in one part will upset the balance and impact all other elements. 3 principles of Hinduism include yajna (sacrifice), dhana (giving) and tapas (penance)….dhana especially entails that whatever you consume you must give back. All the principles emphasize the interconnectedness of life.
Islam: Man is appointed at steward of the earth and will be held accountable to it at the “Day of Judgment.” Qur’an wanrs against disturbing God’s natural balance: “Do no mischief on the earth after it hath been set in order” (7:56). Islamic law designations urban containment zones and hima, specific conservations areas.
*taken from Ecologist freelancer Laura Sevier’s article in Sept. 07 issue